Leonard
Reed’s idea of no one knowing how to create thing as simple as a pen is, is
genius. It describes the true nature of modern society. No one would be able to
create a pen. Surely not as perfect as the ones we buy at stores. Today’s
consumer society enabled every person to have the opportunity to buy products
the individual would not know how to produce, and furthermore for a cheap
price. A price certainly not corresponding to the hours of work the individual
would have to spend on creating the product (as perfect as it is).
Reed
perfectly describes the nature of the production of a simple pen. Lead from
Ceylon, cedar trees from San Leandro etc. These steps are reinforced by
millions of people that even do not know about their contribution. A Brazilian
farmer’s coffee will help a miner in Ceylon, truck driver of Koh-I-Noor or
others. Leonard Reed does explain this perfectly. Today’s web of work or people
is due to globalized communications and infrastructure magically interconnected.
But Leonard Reed reasons this connectionism differently.
“I insist that only God could make me,” Reed
states. I agree with his argumentation – there is no mastermind, no president
of the world telling each individual what to do and yet the resulting
opportunities we have are amazing. How can that happen? It surely is not just a
coincidence, or even an accident. Reed attributes this to God. Only God can
make every individual play their role perfectly, so that person on the other
side of the globe can appreciate its contribution.
I
would reason this modern phenomenon differently. This trend is something new;
something that was not here always.
It developed. It did not happen that a magical person, a God, decided to make
the world connected from now on, but from a small agricultural communities
through Industrial Revolution, a globalized society developed - a society where
individuals contribute, but benefit as well. In fact it is an “Invisible Hand at work “ as Reed
describes.
Not
everything that is occurring, that we have the opportunity to analyze, describe
has to have a creator. It has to have a reason! Leibniz, 17th
century revolutionary philosopher, argues that reason is the fundamental
property of matter. Indeed, the pens we are using everyday at school have a
reason why they are in our hands. We bought them; somebody produced them. But
this circle, especially in the production, doesn’t have to have a mastermind
controlling every step. Instead every step has a sufficient reason to be made.
We
could find parallel in atoms making up the world’s matter. Each step in a
production of a pen or other products I will represent by an atom. And yet as
chaotic as the kinematics of an atom seem, the result is something stable –
something real. Nobody tells each atom what to do. Instead by the circumstances
it moves. It moves by a reason! I think that is the same with today’s society.
An atom million miles away radiates electromagnetic waves that in a tiny-tiny
bit affect the atoms on Earth. I don’t think there is any mastermind. There is
only reason, as Leibniz would argue.
Žádné komentáře:
Okomentovat